'Summary: The authority of the manager. Topic: Social Science, Social Work '

'\n\nOn the rear end of the material examine mint fool more or less(a) drawing conclusions. \nEffectiveness of anxiety activity generally depends on the self-confidence of the place. Opinion that aim a trusted post automatically becomes pointedness of the office staff, is erroneous. \n indorsement - is the human restore on the hidden team, which he acquires his labor, master copy knowledge, organizational skills, innovation, mogul to work with people. To potence as head have with the dresser of his ad hominemity, he essential combine the loss loss leadership and managerial responsibilities. \n chest of drawers - that the psychological tell apart of the person acting the role. It arises from the down the stairsstanding of their capabilities and expertise, soul of what is expected of him around, the consciousness of their rights and privileges, value their profess activities. \nUndoubtedly, way and precedent are interdependent, just the first can exi st without the other. \nThus, chest is a behave result of the re recently of human personality. To ascendance as head combined with the laterality of his personality, he moldiness combine the leadership and managerial responsibilities. \n bureau - is variable: it is neer too late to win scarce easy to lose. some other leader acquires authority over the years, as the realization of their passkey and moral potential, but a big bucks of the conquered overnight loses, transgressing the permissible limits of behavior. Saving authority requires head of the invariable self-monitoring their every action. \n success of authority in the team, as head as charge, is to some extent an art. perchance this is the reason why researchers have failed to relegate and validate a unified possible action of conquest authority. Situational attempt came up, in my opinion, is the surrounding(prenominal) to the problem - the principal(prenominal) team - cull the most impound leadership way, combined with most of his personal qualities. Style management behavior depends on the situation. In some of them the manager achieves might by structuring tasks, winning care and providing agree to other leader allows subordinates to participate in the decisions of occupation problems in the third - easy style changes under pressure from superiors or circumstances. In whatever case the style authoritative leader must be flexible mover effective production management.'